对本文的总体评价为：分

可参考以下标准：

• 5分：佳作、开创性成果
• 4分：合格的优秀论文、可直接接收发表
• 3分：小改（Minor）后可接收
• 2分：需要大改（Major）
• 1分：价值有限，即使修改后亦不能发表
• 0分：本wiki不收录0分的论文。。。

有必要时，可以在文中任何地方插入你的签名。

Modelling the influence of human behaviour on the spread of infectious diseases: a review

1. Sebastian Funk
2. Marcel Salathé
3. Vincent A. A. Jansen

2010

Human behaviour plays an important role in the spread of infectious diseases, and understanding the influence of behaviour on the spread of diseases can be key to improving control efforts. While behavioural responses to the spread of a disease have often been reported anecdotally, there has been relatively little systematic investigation into how behavioural changes can affect disease dynamics. Mathematical models for the spread of infectious diseases are an important tool for investigating and quantifying such effects, not least because the spread of a disease among humans is not amenable to direct experimental study. Here, we review recent efforts to incorporate human behaviour into disease models, and propose that such models can be broadly classified according to the type and source of information which individuals are assumed to base their behaviour on, and according to the assumed effects of such behaviour. We highlight recent advances as well as gaps in our understanding of the interplay between infectious disease dynamics and human behaviour, and suggest what kind of data taking efforts would be helpful in filling these gaps.

Funk, Sebastian, Marcel Salathé, and Vincent AA Jansen. “Modelling the influence of human behaviour on the spread of infectious diseases: a review.” Journal of the Royal Society Interface 7, no. 50 (2010): 1247-1256.

1. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rsif.2010.0142
2. https://eyun.baidu.com/s/3pM6cjEF

1. 论文是关于什么的？[请提供该论文的简要摘要。]

2. 这篇论文的长处和短处是什么？[请以以下角度评述：（a）创新（研究问题、建模、方法等）；（b）相关性（研究问题、发现等）；（c）严谨性（适当的方法、分析的正确性等）]

研究问题、建模、方法等

研究问题、发现

适当的方法、分析的正确性等

3.如果有的话，潜在改进的主要地方是什么？[如果这些关键要求和建议能够被适当处理，请重点关注能使文章发表的关键要求和建议。如果你看到不可逾越的障碍，请清楚地描述你的担忧。如果能为编辑和作者提供具体有建设性的意见最好不过了，并在可能的情况下，提出可行的建议。同样，应避免含糊不清和/或含糊不清的批评。]

4.如果有的话，潜在改进的微小地方是什么？[再次，请具体说明。]

5.有没有机会做一项新的研究？