paper:dissecting_anomalies
差别
这里会显示出您选择的修订版和当前版本之间的差别。
后一修订版 | 前一修订版 | ||
paper:dissecting_anomalies [2019/09/10 14:44] – 创建 kk | paper:dissecting_anomalies [2023/11/10 12:13] (当前版本) – 外部编辑 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
行 2: | 行 2: | ||
+ | 对本文的总体评价为:分 | ||
+ | |||
+ | 可参考以下标准: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * 5分:佳作、开创性成果 | ||
+ | * 4分:合格的优秀论文、可直接接收发表 | ||
+ | * 3分:小改(Minor)后可接收 | ||
+ | * 2分:需要大改(Major) | ||
+ | * 1分:价值有限,即使修改后亦不能发表 | ||
+ | * 0分:本wiki不收录0分的论文。。。 | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== 文献基本信息 ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== 标题 ==== | ||
+ | Dissecting Anomalies | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== 作者 ==== | ||
+ | - Eugene F. Fama | ||
+ | - Kenneth R. French | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==== 出版年份 ==== | ||
+ | 2008 | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== 来源 ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==== 关键词 ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==== 摘要 ==== | ||
+ | The anomalous returns associated with net stock issues, accruals, and momentum | ||
+ | are pervasive; they show up in all size groups (micro, small, and big) in cross-section | ||
+ | regressions, | ||
+ | growth and profitability anomalies are less robust. There is an asset growth anomaly | ||
+ | in average returns on microcaps and small stocks, but it is absent for big stocks. | ||
+ | Among profitable firms, higher profitability tends to be associated with abnormally | ||
+ | high returns, but there is little evidence that unprofitable firms have unusually low | ||
+ | returns. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== 引用方式 ==== | ||
Fama, Eugene F., and Kenneth R. French. " | Fama, Eugene F., and Kenneth R. French. " | ||
- | https:// | + | ==== 链接 ==== |
+ | |||
+ | - https:// | ||
+ | - https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== 评阅意见 ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== 文献简介 ==== | ||
+ | 1. 论文是关于什么的?[请提供该论文的简要摘要。] | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==== 文献评价 ==== | ||
+ | 2. 这篇论文的长处和短处是什么?[请以以下角度评述:(a)创新(研究问题、建模、方法等);(b)相关性(研究问题、发现等);(c)严谨性(适当的方法、分析的正确性等)] | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | === 创新性 === | ||
+ | 研究问题、建模、方法等 | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | === 相关性 === | ||
+ | 研究问题、发现 | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | === 严谨性 === | ||
+ | 适当的方法、分析的正确性等 | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==== 需改改进之处 ==== | ||
+ | 3.如果有的话,潜在改进的主要地方是什么?[如果这些关键要求和建议能够被适当处理,请重点关注能使文章发表的关键要求和建议。如果你看到不可逾越的障碍,请清楚地描述你的担忧。如果能为编辑和作者提供具体有建设性的意见最好不过了,并在可能的情况下,提出可行的建议。同样,应避免含糊不清和/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==== 需要小改的地方 ==== | ||
+ | 4.如果有的话,潜在改进的微小地方是什么?[再次,请具体说明。] | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==== 进一步研究的可能与方向 ==== | ||
+ | 5.有没有机会做一项新的研究? | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==== 其他评价 ==== | ||
+ |
paper/dissecting_anomalies.1568097886.txt.gz · 最后更改: 2023/11/10 12:12 (外部编辑)