对本文的总体评价为：分

可参考以下标准：

• 5分：佳作、开创性成果
• 4分：合格的优秀论文、可直接接收发表
• 3分：小改（Minor）后可接收
• 2分：需要大改（Major）
• 1分：价值有限，即使修改后亦不能发表
• 0分：本wiki不收录0分的论文。。。

Will robo-advice make wealth management tasteless

1. Georges Hübner

2018

The fast development of robo-advice has responded to a growing demand for automation and enhanced capabilities to industrialize investment advisory (IA) solutions in the FinTech landscape. Until recently, the first generation of robo-advisors have naturally focused on the low-end segment of the IA market, mostly thanks to a rather low sophistication of the portfolio allocation systems based on simplistic versions of Modern Portfolio Theory, leaving wealth managers with no serious competition from fully digitized solutions. Nowadays, the second generation of robo-advisors is more ambitious, both from a scientific and an ergonomic point of view. Even though we are not yet witnessing the age of industrialized big data or machine learning fully automated investment advisors, the maturity level of today’s robo-advisors is sufficient to accommodate behavioral sources of complexity like mental accounting or loss aversion at the investor’s level. The pressure on margins induced by regulation and digitalization gradually increases the competitive advantage of robotized IA in the mass affluent and private banking segments, making them a serious threat to those incumbent firms that cannot adapt with proper tooling or niche offering. In the near future, the mature generation of robo-advisors, with full deep learning and data treatment capacities, will presumably coexist with those firms that have been actively preparing today, that will use performant tools besides human expertise, but in a world in which fees will presumably have largely decreased and service quality will have been improved, at the benefit of the customer.

Hübner, Georges. “Will robo-advice make wealth management tasteless?.” Revue Bancaire et Financière (2018).

1. https://orbi.uliege.be/handle/2268/230161
2. https://eyun.baidu.com/s/3ggRXjj1

1. 论文是关于什么的？[请提供该论文的简要摘要。]

2. 这篇论文的长处和短处是什么？[请以以下角度评述：（a）创新（研究问题、建模、方法等）；（b）相关性（研究问题、发现等）；（c）严谨性（适当的方法、分析的正确性等）]

研究问题、建模、方法等

研究问题、发现

适当的方法、分析的正确性等

3.如果有的话，潜在改进的主要地方是什么？[如果这些关键要求和建议能够被适当处理，请重点关注能使文章发表的关键要求和建议。如果你看到不可逾越的障碍，请清楚地描述你的担忧。如果能为编辑和作者提供具体有建设性的意见最好不过了，并在可能的情况下，提出可行的建议。同样，应避免含糊不清和/或含糊不清的批评。]

4.如果有的话，潜在改进的微小地方是什么？[再次，请具体说明。]

5.有没有机会做一项新的研究？