本wiki是研究组的知识管理工具，我们将用它管理组会、讨论班、个人研究进度、文献评阅等活动和内容。在开始使用本wiki之前请大家自行了解wiki语法syntax，如有需要可以在PlayGround中尝试。

（我将陆续更新本页内容……）

读完每篇（有价值的）论文后，请大家把自己当作评审专家一样思考论文的的贡献和不足，撰写一份“论文评审报告”。本节将依次介绍“评审报告”的格式规范要求以及评审的要点。

评审报告应包括“文献基本信息”和“报告正文”两部分内容。其中“文献基本信息”应包括以下内容：

• 文献标题
• 作者
• 期刊
• 摘要
• 关键词
• 引用方式
• 文献链接

评阅文献时请从以下几个方面入手，。（请大家将以下问题翻译成中文，直接逐条写在原英文版本下面）

1. What is the paper about? [Please provide a brief summary of the paper.]

2. What are the paper’s strengths and weaknesses? [Please comment on strengths in relation to (a) Innovation (research question, modeling, methodology, etc.); (b) Relevance (research question, findings, etc.); and © Rigor (appropriate methodology, correctness of analysis, etc.).]

3. What, if any, are the major areas of potential improvement? [Please focus on key requirements/suggestions that, if appropriately addressed, would make the paper publishable. If you see insurmountable obstacles, please clearly describe your concerns. You can best serve the editors and the authors by being specific and by providing constructive comments accompanied, where possible, by actionable suggestions. A laundry list of all possible improvements is not helpful. Likewise, ambiguous and/or vague criticisms should be avoided.]

4. What, if any, are the minor areas of potential improvement? [Again, please be specific.]

5. Is there any opportunity to do a new piece of research?

等待更新……