对本文的总体评价为:(1-5分,5分最高)
可参考以下标准:
有必要时,可以在文中任何地方插入你的签名。
Is Bitcoin a Real Currency? An economic appraisal
2013
NBER Working Papers
A bona fide currency functions as a medium of exchange, a store of value, and a unit of account, but bitcoin largely fails to satisfy these criteria. Bitcoin has achieved only scant consumer transaction volume, with an average well below one daily transaction for the few merchants who accept it. Its volatility is greatly higher than the volatilities of widely used currencies, imposing large short-term risk upon users. Bitcoin’s daily exchange rates exhibit virtually zero correlation with widely used currencies and with gold, making bitcoin useless for risk management and exceedingly difficult for its owners to hedge. Bitcoin prices of consumer goods require many decimal places with leading zeros, which is disconcerting to retail market participants. Bitcoin faces daily hacking and theft risks, lacks access to a banking system with deposit insurance, and it is not used to denominate consumer credit or loan contracts. Bitcoin appears to behave more like a speculative investment than a currency.
Yermack, David. “Is Bitcoin a real currency? An economic appraisal.” In Handbook of digital currency, pp. 31-43. Academic Press, 2015.
1. 论文是关于什么的?[请提供该论文的简要摘要。]
2. 这篇论文的长处和短处是什么?[请以以下角度评述:(a)创新(研究问题、建模、方法等);(b)相关性(研究问题、发现等);(c)严谨性(适当的方法、分析的正确性等)]
研究问题、建模、方法等
研究问题、发现
适当的方法、分析的正确性等
3.如果有的话,潜在改进的主要地方是什么?[如果这些关键要求和建议能够被适当处理,请重点关注能使文章发表的关键要求和建议。如果你看到不可逾越的障碍,请清楚地描述你的担忧。如果能为编辑和作者提供具体有建设性的意见最好不过了,并在可能的情况下,提出可行的建议。同样,应避免含糊不清和/或含糊不清的批评。]
4.如果有的话,潜在改进的微小地方是什么?[再次,请具体说明。]
5.有没有机会做一项新的研究?