Robo-Advisors: Investing Through Machines

对本文的总体评价为：分

可参考以下标准：

• 5分：佳作、开创性成果
• 4分：合格的优秀论文、可直接接收发表
• 3分：小改（Minor）后可接收
• 2分：需要大改（Major）
• 1分：价值有限，即使修改后亦不能发表
• 0分：本wiki不收录0分的论文。。。

Robo-Advisors: Investing Through Machines

1. Facundo Abraham, World Bank
2. Sergio L. Schmukler, World Bank - Development Research Group (DECRG)
3. José Tessada, Business School, Pontificia Universidad Católica

2019

World Bank

Pensions & Retirement Systems, Educational Sciences, International Trade and Trade Rules, Educational Policy and Planning - Ministry of Education, Educational Institutions & Facilities, Educational Policy and Planning - Institutional Development, Educational Policy and Planning

Investing through online automated platforms, known as robo-advisors, is increasingly popular. Robo-advisors expand access to wealth management services by making it easier and less costly to open investments accounts and receive financial advice, as well as plan and automate investment decisions. However, the rise of robo-advisors requires consumers to understand the limitations of these services and to get proper financial education. Policy makers need to grapple with the impact of robo-advisors on the overall financial system, as well as reassess their regulatory and supervisory practices.

Abraham, Facundo, Sergio L. Schmukler, and Jose Tessada. “Robo-Advisors: Investing through Machines.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 134881 (2019).

1. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3360125
2. https://eyun.baidu.com/s/3pMD3FBH

1. 论文是关于什么的？[请提供该论文的简要摘要。]

2. 这篇论文的长处和短处是什么？[请以以下角度评述：（a）创新（研究问题、建模、方法等）；（b）相关性（研究问题、发现等）；（c）严谨性（适当的方法、分析的正确性等）]

研究问题、建模、方法等

研究问题、发现

适当的方法、分析的正确性等

3.如果有的话，潜在改进的主要地方是什么？[如果这些关键要求和建议能够被适当处理，请重点关注能使文章发表的关键要求和建议。如果你看到不可逾越的障碍，请清楚地描述你的担忧。如果能为编辑和作者提供具体有建设性的意见最好不过了，并在可能的情况下，提出可行的建议。同样，应避免含糊不清和/或含糊不清的批评。]

4.如果有的话，潜在改进的微小地方是什么？[再次，请具体说明。]

5.有没有机会做一项新的研究？