paper:robo_advisors_closer_look
差别
这里会显示出您选择的修订版和当前版本之间的差别。
paper:robo_advisors_closer_look [2019/09/24 11:33] – 创建 kk | paper:robo_advisors_closer_look [2019/09/24 11:54] (当前版本) – 移除 kk | ||
---|---|---|---|
行 1: | 行 1: | ||
- | ====== Robo-Advisors: | ||
- | |||
- | 对本文的总体评价为:(1-5分,5分最高) | ||
- | |||
- | 可参考以下标准: | ||
- | |||
- | * 5分:佳作、开创性成果 | ||
- | * 4分:合格的优秀论文、可直接接收发表 | ||
- | * 3分:小改(Minor)后可接收 | ||
- | * 2分:需要大改(Major) | ||
- | * 1分:价值有限,即使修改后亦不能发表 | ||
- | * 0分:本wiki不收录0分的论文。。。 | ||
- | |||
- | **有必要时,可以在文中任何地方插入你的签名。** | ||
- | ===== 文献基本信息 ===== | ||
- | |||
- | ==== 标题 ==== | ||
- | Robo-Advisors: | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ==== 作者 ==== | ||
- | - Melanie L. Fein, Fein Law Offices | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ==== 出版年份 ==== | ||
- | 2015 | ||
- | |||
- | ==== 来源 ==== | ||
- | ssrn | ||
- | |||
- | ==== 关键词 ==== | ||
- | roboadvisor, | ||
- | |||
- | ==== 摘要 ==== | ||
- | |||
- | Robo-advisors have been touted by the Department of Labor as a source of investment advice that can benefit retirement investors by minimizing costs and avoiding conflicts of interest. On the other hand, they have been labelled as gimmicky and overly simplistic by some critics who have used them. The Securities and Exchange Commission has cautioned that robo-advisors may result in investment recommendations that are based on incorrect assumptions, | ||
- | |||
- | This paper examines whether robo-advisors in fact provide personal investment advice, minimize costs, and are free from conflicts of interest. It also evaluates whether robo-advisors meet a high fiduciary standard of care and act in the client’s best interest. Based on a detailed review of user agreements for three leading robo-advisors, | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ==== 引用方式 ==== | ||
- | Fein, Melanie L. " | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ==== 链接 ==== | ||
- | - https:// | ||
- | |||
- | ===== 评阅意见 ===== | ||
- | |||
- | ==== 文献简介 ==== | ||
- | |||
- | 1. 论文是关于什么的?[请提供该论文的简要摘要。] | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ==== 文献评价 ==== | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | 2. 这篇论文的长处和短处是什么?[请以以下角度评述:(a)创新(研究问题、建模、方法等);(b)相关性(研究问题、发现等);(c)严谨性(适当的方法、分析的正确性等)] | ||
- | |||
- | === 创新性 === | ||
- | 研究问题、建模、方法等 | ||
- | |||
- | === 相关性 === | ||
- | 研究问题、发现 | ||
- | |||
- | === 严谨性 === | ||
- | 适当的方法、分析的正确性等 | ||
- | ==== 需改改进之处 ==== | ||
- | |||
- | 3.如果有的话,潜在改进的主要地方是什么?[如果这些关键要求和建议能够被适当处理,请重点关注能使文章发表的关键要求和建议。如果你看到不可逾越的障碍,请清楚地描述你的担忧。如果能为编辑和作者提供具体有建设性的意见最好不过了,并在可能的情况下,提出可行的建议。同样,应避免含糊不清和/ | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ==== 需要小改的地方 ==== | ||
- | |||
- | 4.如果有的话,潜在改进的微小地方是什么?[再次,请具体说明。] | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ==== 进一步研究的可能与方向 ==== | ||
- | |||
- | 5.有没有机会做一项新的研究? | ||
- | |||
- | ==== 其他评价 ==== | ||
- | |||
paper/robo_advisors_closer_look.1569295999.txt.gz · 最后更改: 2023/11/10 12:13 (外部编辑)